Posted by Alumni from The Atlantic
May 13, 2026
In 1876, an editorial in Princeton's newly founded campus newspaper, The Princetonian, argued against the use of proctors to monitor exams. Proctoring was 'a means of bad moral education,' the author wrote. Treat students as presumptively dishonest, and some would become so; treat them as honorable, and they would learn to behave honorably. And so the editorial board suggested a different approach: 'Let every man write at the end of his paper a pledge that he has neither given nor received help, and let professors and tutors address themselves to some better business than watching for fraud.' That proposal was eventually embodied in Princeton's famous Honor Code, adopted in 1893 and modified only lightly in the ensuing 133 years. When students take their final exams, professors leave the room. Students write down a pledge not to cheat. They are expected to report anyone who does. Any student accused of impropriety comes before a jury of their peers. The Honor Code had a good run. F.... learn more