Best two reviews:
1) ReelViews - It is neither deep nor intelligent, but it's not intended to be either. The saving grace of the otherwise generic product is that Bell's vivacity and Duhamel's rakish charm allow the viewer to root for them. (Rating: 63) Read Full Review >
2) Boxoffice Magazine - Entertaining, full of laughs and, as far as chick flicks go, is a sweet, romantic trip worth taking for audiences so inclined. (Rating: 60) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
18) The Onion (A.V. Club) - It’s the kind of wretched embarrassment that may leave viewers trying to suspend the belief that they’re still sitting in the theater watching it. (Rating: 16) Read Full Review >
19) New York Post - Even by the extremely low standards of the genre, When in Rome gets failing marks for chemistry, credibility and even coherence. (Rating: 0) Read Full Review >
1) ReelViews - It is neither deep nor intelligent, but it's not intended to be either. The saving grace of the otherwise generic product is that Bell's vivacity and Duhamel's rakish charm allow the viewer to root for them. (Rating: 63) Read Full Review >
2) Boxoffice Magazine - Entertaining, full of laughs and, as far as chick flicks go, is a sweet, romantic trip worth taking for audiences so inclined. (Rating: 60) Read Full Review >
Worst two reviews:
18) The Onion (A.V. Club) - It’s the kind of wretched embarrassment that may leave viewers trying to suspend the belief that they’re still sitting in the theater watching it. (Rating: 16) Read Full Review >
19) New York Post - Even by the extremely low standards of the genre, When in Rome gets failing marks for chemistry, credibility and even coherence. (Rating: 0) Read Full Review >
Alumni
6y
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE